<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Smart People Disagree</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksmoore.com/2009/09/17/why-smart-people-disagree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksmoore.com/2009/09/17/why-smart-people-disagree/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Chad Allen Moore.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasondulle</title>
		<link>http://booksmoore.com/2009/09/17/why-smart-people-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jasondulle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksmoore.com/?p=633#comment-184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is so true.  Just recently at my blog I&#039;ve been dialoguing with someone who questions the cogency of William Lane Craig&#039;s arguments because they persuade more believers than unbelievers.  I tried making this same point to him.  I think the biggest issue is prejudicial bias, or what I would call volitional bias.  People can be quite stubborn on certain matters.  They have a conclusion in search of an argument.  They will do whatever hand-waiving is necessary to dismiss arguments against their position, and whatever smoke-in-mirrors trick is necessary to convince themselves and/or others that what they believe is true is actually true.  Of course, Christians can be guilty of the same thing!

Jason]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so true.  Just recently at my blog I&#8217;ve been dialoguing with someone who questions the cogency of William Lane Craig&#8217;s arguments because they persuade more believers than unbelievers.  I tried making this same point to him.  I think the biggest issue is prejudicial bias, or what I would call volitional bias.  People can be quite stubborn on certain matters.  They have a conclusion in search of an argument.  They will do whatever hand-waiving is necessary to dismiss arguments against their position, and whatever smoke-in-mirrors trick is necessary to convince themselves and/or others that what they believe is true is actually true.  Of course, Christians can be guilty of the same thing!</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

